sandun kudu | information technology degrees

Cloud Past, Present and Future

Cloud Past

Any fool can know. the purpose is to know as Einstein stated over 80 years ago. What began as another major IT crusade started from a well-understood position of technical positives but ultimately missed the purpose. information technology degree you see Cloud wasn’t, and more importantly, isn’t about technology.

I was mentioned with the message that has is priceless and therefore the great point about the past is what we will learn but it only matters if we apply this. only a few journeys to new horizons can start with absolute clarity about the destination or what is going to occur on the journey. the aim is we understand the purpose of the journey and what benefit it's going to bring back others. Whatever our purpose or focus from medical discovery, astronomical voyages or supporting the challenges we are presented with as a society, like Ebola this year, Clouds have a greater purpose when applied if we learn as if we were to measure forever.

Perspective remains one among our biggest challenges and that we got to stand back more often than we do. In an ever-impressive world of posts and social media updates, it is often difficult to think about or maybe understand the destination or whom we will benefit. Stephen Sutton rightly touched many us this year, together with his inspirational posts or Candice Curry’s “A Letter to My Daughters stepmom” and lots of more. the purpose is that the add perspective and help us understand more about ourselves.

Technically, Cloud enables. It enables us to try to more, to assist others and make a far better world. within the past we've extolled the virtues of replacing CAPEX with OPEX, pay as you go, buy what you employ, bursting as required and being evergreen. regardless of what it's, you'll have it “as a Service” but we've to offer it a reputation whenever. Let’s ask the question differently, what are we enabling and why but it must be as a Service.

Cloud Present

2014 brought us fabulous new, sophisticated eyewear, a replacement drone-based delivery visionaries and wearable tech in abundance. It brought us UK floods like we've not seen in recent times, the very best level of parking fines ever recorded, more online mega named shopping days which we've already forgotten, till next year and a replacement wave of online security vulnerabilities!

The majority of e-commerce sites now operate within the cloud. Most of our personal data is stored somewhere in clouds as is every move and click on we make. Wearable tech is great but what proportion can we want to and know is shared. Big Data is here, in every sense, analysing all our purchases and movements, our insane exercise patterns and driving journeys but what's the aim. Once we move beyond the social media posts, tweets and followers, what does it mean and what actually is our destination and therefore the true benefits we derive from this gift we call the present?

Well, let’s say we created a sensible application that linked rising water levels to early warning systems for homes and businesses. What say we used location data to tell us of the parking conditions or terms supported our whereabouts? What say we linked the systems we are with, use and depend upon with automatic updates to guard us. What say we electronically linked the sudden rise in reported medical conditions or humanitarian disasters anywhere within the world to government and awareness campaigns? Would this give us great purpose and meaning? wouldn't it actually move us closer to know how we advantage of the technology and the way this will protect us? in fact.

So why not? what's stopping us in these applications to be better citizens? Might it's our application or truly understanding how we measure the benefits? It doesn't come as a service or with a cool LED output ahead folks but it does have some extent.

Cloud Future

So we'd like to determine points for Clouds. It must have a transparent purpose. we'd like to assist people to understand this, What does it mean and where is it going? in any case, it's not how you start but how you finish.

2015 must add the 4 Ps. Slightly different from Kotler’s view but Cloud needs Problem, Purpose, Perspective and Points. In their January 2013 HBR issue of rethinking the 4 P’s the author’s challenged how trusted sources of recommendation and diagnostics must be reviewed. the purpose is we'd like to unravel problems with Cloud otherwise it truly has no purpose. But we must begin with this in mind, not technology trying to identifying problems to unravel. this provides us purpose, and perspective for we will identify can we will resolve issues and the way these benefit us all.

It is a very simple tool but it helps us keep it real and relevant. Unless we are applying what we all know then it's no purpose or relevance for this is often what people are purchasing – this is the purpose. Perspective comes from what we all know, our experience and understanding. this is often how we create the purpose of the proposal and proposition. What we present because the proposition is that the proposal to unravel the matter and thus the purpose of our products and therefore what our customer will purchase. We simply got to readjust our perspective to form Cloud real. No colours of the rainbow, no as a service, no named shopping days, just plain old simple perspective. So where’s the problem?

A view of the cloud in Asia

Let’s start 2015 with a glance to the longer term and therefore the Asia Pacific region. it's fast becoming a centre for cloud technology, and as a rising arena of play, it's bodies falling into place to stay it in restraint.

This is looking to be an enormous year for the Asia Cloud Computing Association (ACCA) which was formed in 2010. We spoke to Lim May-Ann the chief Director of the ACCA to ascertain what 2015, and therefore the greater future, holds for the cloud in Asia.

Firstly, let’s get some background on the ACCA – in 2009 the cloud industry Asia was just fledging, so a gaggle of committed senior executives from the varied cloud and technology companies put together the ACCA as a vendor-neutral organisation to teach the industry. Since its inception, the organisation has grown from strength to strength and features a strong specialise in public advocacy for cloud interests like clear policies surrounding data regulations, data sovereignty and cloud certification.

The ACCA is hospitable membership for all who have vested interest within the Asia Pacific arena – for more specific membership enquiries please visit the ACCA website.

The flagship report that the ACCA produces is the Cloud Readiness Index (CRI), a report on the cloud readiness of economies in the Asia Pacific. Using publicly available information, it's a conglomeration report of ten factors that the ACCA believes comprises cloud readiness: privacy, international connectivity, data sovereignty, broadband quality, government regulatory environment and usage, power system and green policy, IP protection, business sophistication, data centre risk, and freedom of data.

Lim May-Ann said the importance of the report is that if data, data management, and therefore the capacity to manage data, are getting to be the currencies of the longer term, they're getting to be skill sets that economies got to have measured, then developed so as to achieve the 21st century – and beyond.

Essentially that's what the CRI measures – the power and therefore the availability of resources to require up cloud computing. technology credit union So if you study economics you recognize that demand is both the necessity for and therefore the willingness to get something – what we are really measuring is that the ability of the countries to require up cloud computing – whether or not the countries actually do take up cloud computing, that’s another matter altogether.”

The CRI measures the capacity and therefore the ability of cloud industries across 14 countries within the region and ranks them consistent with the report’s findings.

The 2015 report is yet to be released, though we will reminisce at the report from 2014 – allow us to know within the comments your opinion on the results.

View the whole 2014 CRI.

The ACCA is functioning to accelerate cloud computing in the Asia Pacific and is supporting the creation of a secure and stable regulatory environment in order that cloud is often adopted. On top of this, they're also trying to teach a whole region on the advantages of cloud computing and increase business understanding of cloud products.

Presently there's attention on the financial services industry and its take from cloud computing. The ACCA has strong established bases in both Hong Kong and Singapore which are financial centres for the region.

Lim May-Ann said there's tons of dialogue around financial services industry’s use of cloud which, unfortunately, there's a scarcity of clarity when it involves watching the regulations and whether or not the regulations actually leave financial industries to use cloud services.

There was tons of desire for us to teach and have interaction with the varied public agencies to clarify whether or not cloud computing might be used if you were a financial services industry – for the banks and therefore the insurance agencies, for instance, there have been questions around what quite data are you able to store here, and what are you able to store elsewhere [sic]; sharing of credit information; whether a private is creditworthy or not, and other similar information.”

The example Lim May-Ann wont to illustrate her point was my very own situation, as I had moved from the Asia Pacific region, Australia, to London, can my bank share my credit information with a bank here, or do I even have to start out from scratch? (Spoiler alert, I had to start out from scratch, much paperwork.)

There are many questions around (data privacy), I’m proud to ascertain that we’ve actually got quite a lot of traction around that from the govt agencies also, but it's not just the ACCA performing on this, there are multiple organisations posing for clarification from the financial and government agencies.”

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has just come up with updated guidelines on the way to outsource technologies, for instance. While it’s not a specifically tailored to cloud computing – it doesn’t explicitly specify that financial companies can use cloud computing – he updated guidelines strengthened and clarified their language around what kind of technologies might be outsourced to, for instance to IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS.”

Cloud computing within the Asia Pacific is interesting because despite a high take from SaaS products like Dropbox and OneDrive there's still apprehension round the whole concept of cloud, particularly problems arise around cloud costing schemes.

For the Asia Pacific region, one size doesn't fit all. If a service is $5USD per month per user that's affordable for a corporation in Australia, but not necessarily for one based in Myanmar or Indonesia.

Lim May-Ann sees the longer term of the Asia Pacific region’s cloud within the expansion into regions outside of Hong Kong and Singapore.

I would say I feel that tons of the cloud uptake will still remain as potential, tons of the countries face very basic infrastructural questions around power supply and internet connectivity.

Personal clouds

So, cloud and making it personal – what does this actually mean?

Personal clouds are a touch of a quandary and that I believe are a touch misunderstood. you'll see many companies advertising data storage, backup and accessibility products that provide you, the buyer, a private cloud. Free storage and backup of knowledge on the cloud that’s accessible anywhere to home personal cloud-based solutions are available forms just about any large vendor today.

With the huge amount of knowledge that we all use and generate (email, data processing, pictures, movies), we've to store them somewhere. Increasingly we are turning to free services, often marketed to us as our own personal cloud. In my book, if something is free it's little or no value so if something has no value then why would you set something you value onto it? Good question.

Is it a misconception that everything is secure within the Digital Age? Just ask Sony. Why on earth would anyone, including someone within the limelight, place very personal pictures or information about themselves on a service that would potentially be viewed by millions if the wrong security has been applied? A clicked check box at the top of 30-page disclaimer that nobody ever reads is few demonstrations of great security.

So, in my mind there are two issues:

1. there's a basic lack of understanding around the technology that supports a private cloud service. The notion that “everything is roofed and it'll never happen to me” is only too prevalent.

2. Little sense is conspicuous when people only too eagerly place pictures and films of themselves on a free public service. Should it ever be breached the general public disclosure might be very damaging.

Maybe I'm being overly cynical but this is often the case with mainstream cloud technology understanding. we've a price competition happening at the instant. Amazon, Google and Microsoft (and others) are competing against one another with continual price reductions to entice users and grow business.

Let’s face it, nobody can reduce the value of sales continually and make a profit without compensating for losses elsewhere. Now, I’m not saying that the previous companies mentioned have done this, what I'm saying is that it’s an old sales tactic to possess loss leaders to realize market share to sell them something else. All three of those companies sell other services and products – make sense? we should always view the private cloud within the right context: it's personal.

Take Facebook as an example. you'll say that this is often a personal cloud of sorts as there's information totally personal to you stored there for you to share amongst your circle of friends. Anyone with access can view those pictures and messages. that's the entire point of cloud technology, to share collaboratively. But does one trust Facebook? Access is defined by permissions and robust security – we hope. Because your data is online there's a chance, however remote that somebody outside of your circle can share your personal data stored there.

Isn’t it ironic that since the Apple security breach every week or two back both Amazon and Google have announced that they're stepping up their security policies? Why can we await a problem to happen before we start performing on preventative measures?

With the continual advancement of technology and our perceptions of what it can do for us, there are sure to be a misalignment of expectations to reality. I might wish to use the analogy of a Hybrid Cloud model. what's Hybrid I hear you ask? Good question and if you asked 5 people you'd get different. the kinds of Cloud are evolving to suit business needs and this has never been more apparent with the emergence of the term Hybrid cloud computing.

We seemingly understand Private and Public clouds, but Hybrid? The hybrid may be a term that has been defined as a mixture of personal and public services based at your location(s). Hybrid clouds are already in use by many businesses. Maybe you backup your data to a different location? Maybe you've got applications delivered to over the web (often mentioned as SaaS or Software-as-a-Service). The hybrid may be a broad term that encompasses such a lot of what cloud has got to offer.

Confusion is rife with cloud technology generally. As a technologist I take this without any consideration sometimes and that I like to get different perspectives on the topic from others outside the industry. I can definitely say that after travelling all around the world for my job, for pleasure and sometimes only for the hell of it, there's a serious misunderstanding of cloud technologies by the overall population.

As we advance with our ever-increasing computing power our expectation exceeds the truth of what technology can do. Automation and therefore the aggregation of knowledge, Big Data, have improved but our clouds don’t think for us yet. sense requires abstract reasoning that cloud computing cannot yet apply to data.

The cloud cannot think or make the type of private decisions we might make individually. Technology can only analyse and predict outcomes supported the previous history. Even today, could an excellent computer just like the IBM Watson be ready to tell you when your naked selfies were on a storage system with poor security levels in place? Maybe the solution should be “are you crazy to store those pictures online within the first place?”

As technology becomes more advanced, so do the challenges of understanding it. Providers are businesses and their sense isn’t necessarily yours.

So we got to understand the fashionable technology that surrounds us or just have blind faith within the providers that provide our personal cloud services? At the top of the day, it's your choice in how you utilise cloud technologies. But you would possibly want to think about being a touch more educated on the risks that accompany these, often free, commodity cloud services. Don’t just specialise in the advantages.

I think where we’re getting to see more possibilities are in economies where mobile services are the very best. Indonesia and Myanmar are two countries which could have very successful cloud marketing strategies when the marketing hits that segment of the population which is currently having their first computing experience in mobile form instead of a desktop or a laptop.”

So we will see 2015 because the year for the Asia Pacific to get up, for mobile services to reign supreme, and for the mobile generation to be taken seriously. information technology degrees personal computer is fading call at the Asia Pacific, so as for cloud services to be considered seriously they need to be mobile-ready.

The up and coming regions of the planet are developing faster than they ever have before, the cloud is slowly but surely penetrating into their markets, and developing economies are inviting it in – but not without asking the important questions.