Cloud technology is not any longer an IT issue but a departmental decision
For businesses today, the choice to deploy cloud services not sits solely within the IT department. Having technology knowledge when it involves getting the foremost from the cloud isn't essential and more often than not, demand is coming from the business functions themselves who are realizing the advantages that cloud-based services could bring back their day-to-day operations. A recent report from Kronos surveyed 1,000 office workers in organizations with between 50 and 500 employees across the united kingdom, Netherlands and Belgium. The research highlighted that those performing at small and medium-sized businesses are conscious of the advantages of cloud computing and are increasingly demanding it as an enabler of enterprise mobility and adaptability. The key statistic from the report was that 64 percent of employees believed cloud applications were important in supporting their day-to-day work, while 83 percent prefer cloud applications to those deployed on-premise. It went on to seek out that on average, workers use six different cloud applications per month, which shows the recognition of this technology is constant to rise among SMEs.
With this in mind, businesses got to consider the importance of providing a cloud solution, particularly for data-hungry departments, such as marketing and finance. Here the cloud provides real business value, not just IT efficiencies.
Flexibility for the finance department
A report prepared by CFO Research together with Google highlighted that 64 percent of finance executives said that after implementing a cloud solution, it reduced operational costs by up to twenty percent within the corporate, with a further 15 percent anticipating that within the future operational costs could far exceed this. As well because of the cost-saving, the survey highlighted that the finance department also understood the companywide agility and productivity the cloud could provide. 36 percent of the respondents said their company’s move to the cloud was motivated by a requirement for greater flexibility and 35 percent for improved productivity.
Cloud technology also can positively impact employee performance, as staff will have access to state of the art cloud applications, with the report showing 81 percent of respondents believed an entire implementation of cloud-based systems would improve employee productivity also as contribute to high-value activities like corporate-strategy setting (68 percent).
Marketing moves to digital
Marketing departments also can benefit hugely from cloud solutions. The technology helps to deliver timely campaigns and allows the department to speak with others quickly and efficiently. consistent with the Fourth Source, the most important change within the marketing landscape is that the transition from an en-masse broadcast call-to-action approach to a media-rich, real-time custom messaging strategy. Within this department, the aim now's to use specific information to speak more effectively to customers anytime, anywhere.
it is vital for companies to believe the fastest computing performance available
With the increased use of video advertising, mobile apps, and therefore the development of the newest mobile technologies, cloud solutions now allow marketers to require advantage of those trends, because the amount of knowledge being generated are often carefully scrutinized and analyzed, to deliver the foremost engaging online campaigns. The approach for the marketing department is usually focused on speed and precision instead of creativity. Therefore, it's vital for companies to believe in the fastest computing performance available, to deliver timely communications and proportion or down as capacity is required.
With businesses witnessing a knowledge explosion, it’s not just large scale enterprises that require to make sure their data storage and management procedures are up to scratch. From creative departments, through to marketing and finance, the reliance on customer information and digital data is becoming more crucial than ever before. With cloud services providing the right solution for those SMEs lacking the required infrastructure in-house, a personal cloud option can provide more control and confidence within the safety of knowledge stored within the cloud, without the big-business tag.
Three Myths about Cloud and Security
Businesses regularly ask whether transitioning to the cloud is secure. The question is understandable, as there have been tons of fear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD) spread across the industry over the past few years. Gartner thinks that cloud computing, by its very nature, is uniquely susceptible to the risks of myths.
much of the negative chatter about cloud security is unfounded
However, much of the negative chatter about cloud security is unfounded and is just an extension of what's already being addressed across the physical infrastructure. So let’s take a glance at some common statements against the cloud, and why they're better classified as myths than truths.
Myth #1: Cloud is riskier than traditional IT
Your infrastructure isn’t necessarily safer simply because it's located on-premise. Data breaches, data loss, account hijacking, and denial of service attacks are concerns since the invention of the mainframe back in the 1960s. And while it's true that improperly configured cloud resources may result in these sorts of vulnerabilities, an equivalent is often said of improperly configured physical infrastructure. The key to a secure cloud implementation is functioning with a competent, experienced provider who makes investing within the strongest sorts of networking security, intrusion detection, and monitoring services core to their business. In many cases, the safety controls an experienced provider can handle may go well above and beyond your in-house IT team’s capabilities.
Myth #2: You can’t control where your data resides within the cloud
Heavily regulated industries like healthcare and finance have controls that dictate where personally identifiable information and guarded health information (PHI) can reside. For these sorts of organizations, it's going to be (incorrectly) assumed that cloud isn’t a viable option thanks to the idea that the situation of knowledge can't be controlled. This “cloud myth” is definitely discredited by understanding that organizations can prefer to work with a provider that operates out of specific data centers in specific geographic regions. Highly regulated organizations also can leverage a personal cloud deployment model that gives them increased control and governance versus the general public cloud.
Myth #3: The cloud isn't suitable for compliant workloads
As I discussed above, organizations with compliant workloads can still leverage the cloud; however, a personal or hybrid cloud deployment model could also be better suited to their needs. a personal cloud allows organizations to enjoy the pliability and scalability benefits of the cloud, while still keeping data secure and in their control. A hybrid model provides the additional advantage of having the ability to “burst” to a public cloud for non-compliant workloads like development and testing. Break down-regulation barriers to cloud adoption
There is little question that cloud computing has now achieved mainstream deployment within the UK. Recent research from the Cloud Industry Forum (CIF) found that some 78 percent of UK organizations are adopting a minimum of one cloud-based service, a rise of 15 percent over previous figures. More telling is that turning to the cloud is not just the reserve of huge blue-chip organizations, with 75 percent of SMEs also embracing cloud technology.
With cloud technology continually evolving, it's now become a mainstream solution for businesses and an integral part of an organization’s overall IT strategy. consistent with Gartner, cloud computing has been highlighted together of the highest strategic technology trends in 2015 that organizations cannot afford to avoid.
Across the broader business landscape, web hosting, email, CRM, data back-up, and disaster recovery still be the foremost pervasive cloud services used. However, organizations within heavily regulated industries like the financial services, healthcare, or legal have so far shied faraway from cloud technology, unsure of the proper strategy and scared of the potential security risks. The Cloud Security Alliance recently found that although the take-up is increasing within financial services, with private cloud the foremost popular for those testing the waters, security remains their main concern.
Times are changing. A report undertaken by Ovum this month revealed that 54% of IT decision-makers globally say they now store sensitive data within the cloud. The cloud features a distinct benefit for smaller institutions in heavily regulated industries. they will cash in on the talents and better security that cloud providers like Cube52 offer, instead of having to take a position in their own staff, software, and hardware. the cash saved can then be used for better education of staff and to make sure that security is often tested and fit the purpose.
One of the most regulatory requirements that have historically dissuaded heavily regulated industries to maneuver faraway from their legacy on-premise solutions is that the need for sensitive data (whether it's a customer or financial information) to not cross geographical boundaries. the difficulty of location – data sovereignty – is currently top of mind for several thanks to the EU Data Protection Directive adopted in 1995 being set to get replaced with new legislation referred to as The EU General Data Protection Regulation a while this year.
What is important to recollect, is that whilst the cloud exists within the ether, that ether will ultimately always be located during a physical location so are often managed accordingly. Organizations should choose a vendor that will guarantee the situation of its datacentre, with proximity being a key thing about this decision. But, whilst cloud location should not be a barrier, consideration should tend as to if a public, private or hybrid setup is that the right one.
Public clouds are supported by shared physical hardware which is owned and operated by third-party providers.
Public clouds are supported by shared physical hardware which is owned and operated by third-party providers. the first benefits of the general public cloud are the speed with which you'll deploy IT resources, and therefore the fact it's often the most cost-effective option as costs are spread across a variety of users. However, the safety of knowledge held within a multi-tenanted public cloud environment is usually a cause for concern in heavily regulated industries.
A private cloud may be a bespoke infrastructure dedicated purely to your business. The private cloud delivers all the agility, scalability, and efficiency benefits of the general public cloud, but with greater levels of control and security. This makes it preferable for industries with strict data, regulation, and governance obligations. Another key advantage of the private cloud is the ability to completely customize the infrastructure components to best fit your specific IT requirements, something that can't be achieved so easily within the public cloud environment.
The Hybrid cloud may be a newer addition and allows the business to mix public cloud with private cloud or dedicated hosting. This way, a business can enjoy the benefits of every within a bespoke solution. for instance, a business could use the general public cloud for non-sensitive operations, the private cloud for business-critical operations, and incorporate any existing dedicated resources to realize a highly flexible, highly agile, and highly cost-effective solution.
Overall, the rationale for moving to the cloud is not any different for businesses in heavily regulated industries than people who aren’t. Flexible infrastructure, faster provision, and time to plug low cost, and staff skills shortages in their own IT department. Security must remain a crucial consideration, but with flexible, resilient, and secure solutions available there's no reason why all industries can’t embrace a facet of cloud technology today and reap the advantages.
The ‘Intergalactic’ Infrastructure of the longer term
The Evolution of Cloud
Today, most companies are using some sort of cloud service. consistent with Gartner, the Worldwide Public Cloud Services Market is now worth $131 billion: once you consider that ten years ago the sole clouds people had heard of were those within the sky, this is often pretty remarkable growth. So why has cloud adoption enjoyed such phenomenal success? And is it really such a replacement concept?
It might be argued that the thought of cloud was actually introduced as early because of the 1960s by J.C.R Licklider, who voiced his idea of an ‘intergalactic computer network’. Licklider’s idea was that everybody in the world would eventually be interconnected, accessing applications and data at any site, from anywhere. Today, we will see that we are moving ever-closer to Licklider’s intergalactic future, with the cloud acting because of the primary delivery mechanism. The ‘cloud’ has become something of a catch-all phrase for love or money which will be delivered via the web, whether it's infrastructure, data, applications, or a platform. However, at the elemental root of all IT innovation is that the computing power that drives and supports it – so to narrow the scope, I even have focused on the evolution of infrastructure, instead of Software-as-a-Service and Platform-as-a-Service.
The Iron Age
To understand how we've come to the version of cloud we've today, it's worth having a glance back to life before ‘cloud’ and the way the infrastructure environment has developed over the years. It might be argued that the mainframe represents the primary iteration of the cloud as we all know it today. Widely acknowledged within the 1950s because the ‘future of computing’, large-scale mainframes, colloquially mentioned as “big iron”, provided an outsized scale central infrastructure, shared by various applications and IT services. just like the cloud, businesses could scale resources up and down, counting on their needs. apart from maintenance and support, mainframe costs were attributed consistently with Million Instructions Per Second (MIPS) consumption; the more it had been used, the more MIPS were consumed, and therefore the higher the value. While revolutionary at the time, and still in use to the present day, mainframes even have limitations. Mainframes require a massive up-front investment, including the rapidly depreciating the value of physical servers over time, and are expensive to run and maintain. Companies also are limited by the quantity of server capacity they need on-site, which suggests they will struggle to scale capacity consistent with need.
et one among the most reasons that folks began to move workloads faraway from the mainframe and onto client servers was actually one among the explanations people are today moving faraway from client servers and into the cloud: decentralization. As mentioned above, mainframes act as a central resource, meaning within the youth that they had to be connected to computer terminals so as to work. While this didn't drag when companies only had a couple of computers, the introduction of private computers within the 1970s changed everything. Throughout the late 1980s and early 1990s, the distributed client/server model became extremely popular, as applications were migrated from mainframes with input/output terminals to networks of desktop computers. This offered newfound convenience and adaptability for businesses, but also added layers of complication in terms of managing this new distributed environment.
The World Wide Web
By the mid-1990s the web revolution was having a huge impact on culture and therefore the way we consumed technology, and also moving us closer to the cloud that we all know and love today. While the distributed on-premise model that had emerged within the 80s had offered huge cost and productivity gains because it became more integral to business operations the demand for power increased alongside. This created a replacement set of problems, as companies had to seek out money for brand spanking new servers and space to place them, resulting in datacentres and adding further layers of complexity to infrastructure management information technology degrees. Not only this, but there were tons of waste thanks to the variable need for capacity; companies had to ante upfront for servers to support their peak levels of capacity, albeit this level was only required infrequently. This made capacity planning a mammoth task, and sometimes meant companies needed to form a trade on performance sometimes of peak traffic.
VMs, including the web, enabled a replacement generation of infrastructure cloud services
Hosting companies emerged to fill this gap, promising to manage businesses’ infrastructure for a hard and fast monthly fee. Hosting opened the door to what we see as cloud today, by helping businesses to urge obviate their physical servers and therefore the headaches related to running them. Yet while hosted services had tons of advantages , businesses increasingly began to feel locked into rigid contracts paying for capacity and services that they weren't using and commenced to crave more flexibility. Then within the early 2000s came virtualization, which allowed business to run different workloads on different virtual machines (VMs). By virtualizing servers, businesses could spin up new servers without having to require out more datacentre space, helping to deal with tons of the problems faced within the on-premise world. However, these machines still needed to be manually managed, and still require a physical server to supply the computing power needed to run them.
VMs, including the web, enabled a replacement generation of infrastructure cloud services that we see today. Cloud providers could run multiple workloads from remote locations, helping companies to deploy resources as and when needed, without contracts or large upfront investments. By giving businesses access to a network of remote servers hosted on the web, companies could start to store and manage their data remotely, instead of employing a local server. Users could simply check in to the service, pick an instance size of the server, and away they are going. most significantly, they might make changes consistent with demand, with the choice to prevent the service whenever they wanted.
Breaking bad habits
90% of companies see over-provisioning as a necessary evil so as to guard performance
Not tons have changed over the past ten years and this model largely reflects the cloud computing we see today. While users today have greater choice over the instance size of Virtual Machine (VM) they want to deploy, they still buy the service supported the extent of capacity they provision, whether or not they use it or not. cloud computing technology Unless businesses are prepared to deploy expensive and sophisticated technology to automatically scale capacity consistent with usage,