rathu eliyak | information technology degree






The Miniaturisation of IT and Data Centres



Today we all hear about the consumerisation of IT, but the one subject most vendors and data centres don't wish to face is what I define because the miniaturisation of IT.


I am a proud iPhone 6s + owner (and an Apple watch, iPad Pro, MacBook Air, iPad Mini 4 all of those in Gold), once I hold my iPhone up i'm wondering how…

The ‘how’ i'm wondering is how does this one small device have more processing power than all the Allied and Axis powers combined during war II. it's amazing once you check out the first Turing bombes or the later colossus machine and wonder how far forward the humanity has come.

an iphone now performs more functions than ever imaginable when mobile telephones were invented

But like any device it's subject to reform, refinement, resizing or adapting to a replacement format altogether. An example of this is often the amount of functions my iPhone performs that required other devices previously;

Email – this required a desktop or laptop
Music – this required a C90 cassette or phonograph 
Music store – I even have iTunes which is digital delivery of services instead of the normal vinyl record or cassette
iBook’s – I read my books supported a digital download instead of traditional book manufacturer or consumption
The above are just a couple of examples where functions and form are realised into a more compact function.

Lets do a touch of future gazing, one among my personal hobbies watching current devices and services and predicting future form and function:


Data centres / Servers / Storage

Future Form: can we need such huge properties and devices guzzling power, spinning up out of date components. My view is that the power of the massive providers like Microsoft Azure, IBM SoftLayer, Amazon AWS will all fit onto one form factor of todays single server within 20 years. As I predicted a few years ago on this blog, we are starting to see the fusion of biomechanics with computing. As Quantum computing and artificial DNA storage become mainstream todays devices will become more and more obsolete. I hear with interest many networking and storage companies moving towards being ‘software only’ companies we'll see more of those announcements within the next few years.


Hybrid, Hybrid, Hybrid, before we see what I term as ‘the great leap’ towards cloud based technologies, we'll first see a gradual migration, using hybrid technologies which resemble current architectures. These Hybrid technologies like those used within the car industry will allow familiarisation with future enhancements whilst retaining the present look and feel of IT hardware. The hybrid transition will enter the laggard space by 2018.

Future Function: people who invest in data centres should now move onto another website here’s an excellent link www.whufc.com. In my view data centres that don't modernise and open up their doors, embracing local and national communities will die. just like the much-maligned 1960’s tower blocks being pulled down round the UK, the info centres that don't offer quite technical land are going to be like lemmings walking towards a cliff. The function of the longer term data centre are going to be in my view very different today and based upon biotech and be more technical hubs for people who need premises.

in my view, Data centres that don't modernise and open up their doors, embracing local and national communities will die.

My view is that within 10 years most mega-cloud providers would of built their own data centres in order that they control the complete stack, whilst regional data centres will lose 80% of capacity, which can got to get replaced by other revenue streams. Servers / storage and other hardware functions are going to be software controlled and take 99% less footprint that todays technical architectures. My final thoughts modernise now otherwise you are going to be extinct sort of a dodo.


Laptops and mobile devices 

the issue is whether or not the synthetic Intelligence Community can leave the shape to be made into a chip…

Future Form: We could make this as small as an atom if needs be, the difficulty is whether or not the synthetic Intelligence Community can leave the shape to be made into a chip. the rationale I say this, voice dictation and thought control are going to be essential to miniaturise these devices. The keyboard layout is crucial to several conversant in creating spread-sheets and data processing functions. My prediction: the laptop and mobile are going to be chip sized with embedded computer game functions which will begin a virtual keyboard for those that wish to type using QWERTY.

Future Function: IoT, M2M and the other acronym I can throw out there'll be controlled consumed and executed by a bio chip. We are already beginning to see home automation and private health embedded via apps onto these devices. My view is future everything from our passports to movies are going to be embedded onto every human as a biochip with AI functions interacting with our thoughts.



IBM Cloud Security Enforcer and the way it stops shadow IT



By now, you'd have hoped that there had been enough data breach headlines and cyberattack scaremongering for each business to understand the importance of security. However, companies are often so busy that specialize in external threats that they neglect their internal vulnerabilities. One such security failing that must be tackled from within is shadow IT.


The rise of cloud computing and smartphone technology has eroded the role of the IT department in many businesses. the typical employee is, by and enormous , comfortable with purchasing and using devices to access company data and applications, without making IT personnel aware. BYOD, remote working and cloud applications have all brought countless benefits, but they need also wrestled control faraway from businesses.

Of course, in most cases the workers engaged in shadow IT don't have any malicious intent. However, when staff act without authorisation, there are often risks involved. Firstly, shadow IT are often costly as many individual licenses fail to profit from economies of scale. the utilization of third-party cloud applications also means company data might be in danger . Clearly IT teams got to reclaim some level of control – but it's currently proving a challenge. A recent survey by Cloud Security Alliance found that nearly 72 per cent of executives and IT managers don't know the amount of shadow IT apps within their organisation.


when staff act without authorisation, there are often risks involved


For IT managers looking to realize a handle on the shadow IT happening within their organisation, IBM Cloud Security Enforcer offers some hope. It provides IT teams with a transparent dashboard breaking down the cloud apps getting used and by whom. It also offers alerts if employees are breaking company policy or acting during a way that would put business data in danger . Previously, IT managers would have had to trawl through mountains of knowledge to realize this information, but now assessing the danger of shadow it's a way simpler process. Crucially, it give businesses visibility, also as control.

IBM Cloud Security Enforcer also provides real-time threat intelligence, so businesses can respond rapidly to any potential vulnerabilities or attacks, and by covering PCs and mobile devices, it guarantees robust protection.information technology education
 Identity and access management is additionally provided to make sure that individuals only have access to the resources that are relevant to their work. IT managers can create an employee launchpad of approved cloud apps to make sure that there's always an easily accessed alternative to shadow IT. 


In fact, it's important to understand that IBM Cloud Security Enforcer isn’t about clamping down on employee freedom. the increase of shadow IT stems more from employees trying to be productive than it does deliberate deception. It’s important, therefore, that organisations still encourage this productivity, but introduce better safeguard for the business. With IBM Cloud Security Enforcer, it’s much easier for business to scale back risk without crippling employee freedom.Close To Home: The Case for personal Cloud Computing

Public, hybrid or private? When it involves cloud computing, your organisation features a wealth of choice — all three models are now viable, because of maturing technology and increasing standardisation efforts. As notes by Forbes, however, despite the widening market, many companies still consider public deployments the de facto cloud choice. In fact, the private cloud infrastructure market gained a solid 16 percent last year. What’s more, public and personal compound annual growth rates are expected to stay pace over subsequent five years. Bottom line? There’s a true case for going private — here are four reasons you'll want to stay the cloud on the brink of home.




Compliance

All businesses are subject to some compliance regulations — for instance , any retail organisation using point-of-sale (POS) services or collecting credit data online for e-commerce purchases must adhere to PCI DSS data handling standards. Certain industries, however, must ensure they will accurately track the movement and access all information in their organisation. Consider health care: HIPAA standards define specific requirements for the handling of electronic health records. Finance companies, meanwhile, must be ready to demonstrate — even within the event of a network breach — that they’ve done everything possible to safeguard consumer data. While many public offerings now advertise specific standard compliance, this task is simpler if you keep total control of your cloud environment.

While many public offerings now advertise specific standard compliance, this task is simpler if you keep total control of your cloud environment


Security

Security is another key element of the private cloud. Although public cloud solutions have evolved to rival the defensive protection of on-premises alternatives, many IT professionals remain uncomfortable with the thought of outsourcing any portion of security control to public providers — what happens if reference to public servers is lost, or your provider permits a knowledge breach? Staying private permits granular control of all security tasks and keeps hardware accessible .


Clarity

As noted by TechTarget, private clouds are an honest fit companies with superior line-of-business clarity — in other words, if you've got a selected cloud vision and have the capital available, private cloud could also be the higher choice. While it’s impossible for many businesses to match the feature sets of public cloud offerings, in some cases, less is more: By designing a personal cloud to suit specific needs, you'll avoid the issues of both over provisioning and over spending.


Customisation

You may also want to think about going private if customisation tops your priority list. While public clouds offer a number of features and on-demand compute resources, limitations exist — public providers profit by delivering service under a “common denominator” model. Private clouds, meanwhile, allow your IT staff to customize not only software and platforms, but also infrastructure to satisfy specific needs. for instance , industrial design firms may have graphics-heavy workloads that need graphics processing unit (GPU) throughput not supported by public deployments. Public-private customisation is additionally emerging. Next Platform notes that it’s now possible to run a “slice” public cloud on premises to make a very hybrid environment.

You may also want to think about going private if customisation tops your priority list

Considering the cloud? While public remains the foremost popular choice, private alternatives offer benefits to deal with unique corporate needs.


Are Vendors rupture of affection with MSPs?


Every industry round the globe follows trends that make cause and effect relationships.information technology schools Within the IT industry there has always been ebbs and flows, normally induced by following the vendors marketing funds.


This time last year any IT vendor or distributor was calling for the recruitment of MSPs (Managed Service Provider) with the gusto of a crier ringing out the newest news or the penance of a medieval monk wearing a shirt .

The issue i'm seeing now though, is that the lack of sales generated by the MSP channels, thanks to not being a sell-through organisation and only using IT hardware and software for his or her own multi-tenant consumption.

The consequence within the vendors (aside from dwindling staff bonuses) is disillusionment within the channel functions, combined with prostrating apologies to traditional partners, who were overlooked of selling funding pots for the last year.


Playing to the laggard space

every vendor salesperson features a family to feed and clothe, therefore they're going to always go where the cash is to enable targets to be hit

My personal view is that each vendor salesperson features a family to feed and clothe, therefore they're going to always go where the cash is to enable targets to be hit. just like the insurance industry a few years ago, which changed from a commission, based to salaried structure, the times of the seller shiny suited salesman being the middleman are slowly drawing to an in depth . subsequent two years won't see a serious step change, what i'm already beginning to see is that the emergence of a replacement vendor salesperson, one who is focussed on being essential to clients adding value instead of being coin operated.

The MSP community has tended with all this recent attention to act with quite swagger, in my view this is often like the dot COM period of the many years ago. This swagger combined with the straightforward availability of vendor marketing funds for an easy MSP rebrand has now caused a period of stagnation and disillusionment.


Sorting the MSP wheat from the chaff

It is easy to use a badge of honour to either a replacement or existing business; we've seen this consistently over the years from the over use of the word ‘cloud’ we are now seeing this with the term ‘MSP’. Having been exposed to variety of providers over the years there are variety of core differentiators that we see that defines quality from quantity within the MSP space.


The following is my personal top five points i exploit to define a top quality MSP (not so as of preference):


Ability to pay salespeople.

A simple as this sounds an MSP model is predicated on subscription instead of sell-through margins. A service may make profits of only small proportions but over a period of your time far outweigh sell-through profit margins. A model that rewards salespeople within this environment is vital to maintaining growth.

Consultants not salespeople

It may seem that I aim taking aim at the sales function I make no apologies for this. Monthly or quarterly contracts have removed the once renowned ‘hit and run’ tactic of old. End-users (the ultimate product consumer) doesn't wish to be ‘sold to’, they want to be told educated and consider the MSP’s battlefront staff as partners NOT self interested coin operated robots, who will say anything to win a deal.

Reformed Marketing

The days of ‘lets buy a marketing list’ then ‘email spam that list’ followed up by ‘lets cold call that list’ are over. If you're a marketer, residing during a vendor funding such actions, or an MSP executing such actions hang your head in shame. you're no worse than the annoying people we get tele-spamming our mobiles with unsolicited calls. Face it this type of selling went down with the titanic. Grow up, embrace social and digital be essential be told but in particular be relevant. the newest trend I even have seen in successful providers, is that the leveraging of massive data and analytics to work out direction and strategy. PS, many PR agencies are about as useful as a ‘cat flap in an elephant house’ consider before appointing one.

Self determination

I have seen variety of hardware and software purchases made on the rear of promises made by vendors of helping the partner sell-out to end-users. Whilst this is often great for the MSP is there not a requirement for self-determination within an MSP, the old saying ‘be cruel to be kind’ is prevalent here. If a MSP needs a vendor to sell out and market a service then that MSP isn't getting to get cut from the seller crutch and determine their own destiny. From a vendor standpoint don't spoon feed your partners, educate digitally transform, train and plan and teach them to be self-sufficient. Or better still enable the distributors to try to to this..

Technical ability

Never before within the history of the computing industry has the technical team had an opportunity to face upfront and be respected. I often hear that without sales there's a no technical department, my view in terms of client adoption and retention the age of the ‘techie’ is here. With clients tuning bent repetitive marketing automation, not bothering to satisfy salespeople, this is often some time to shine!
Technical ability are often defined in some ways but my personal view isn't some BS vendor accreditation that anyone can exam cram and pass

Technical ability are often defined in some ways but my personal view isn't some BS vendor accreditation that anyone can exam cram and pass, but the power to repair customers issues especially when under tons of pressure.information technology degree
 just like the ‘Ice Man’ within the movie ‘Top Gun’ this is often your chance to maneuver that coolness into a more pre-sales consultancy role. Cloud and SaaS services are moving so rapidly those technical departments that don't embrace change advise out-dated costly solutions do a client disservice. Aligning the technical department to agile business strategy, are going to be more prevalent in Q4 2016 my advice embrace this now and implement.